Last week, at the stunning student union of The Ohio State University, Battelle convened a meeting entitled 21st Century Energy & Economic Summit on behalf of Ohio Governor John Kasich, who both opened and closed the conference with some observations. The agenda covered a wide spectrum of energy issues facing Ohio, and didn’t lack for interesting moments.
One of the hot issues in Ohio energy policy is whether the renewable portfolio standard and energy efficiency provisions of the last major energy act, SB 221 from 2008, are vulnerable. Indeed, some of Kasich’s fellow Republicans in the Ohio Senate recently released SB 216, a bill to completely eliminate the renewable and efficiency requirements of SB 221 — although it is widely viewed that the bill has no chance of passage. Acknowledging this, as reported by The Columbus Dispatch, Kasich said in his introductory remarks that several parties are “trying to get me to say we don’t need renewables here.” But, he continued, “of course we need renewables. Of course we need solar and of course we need wind.” In his concluding remarks at the end of the two-day event, he reiterated that “I believe in renewables. My kids believe in renewables.”
Kasich also had a kind comment for his predecessor, noting that the Strickland Administration had done “a number of good things on energy efficiency for the state” that needed to be built upon.
Nevertheless, expect some retrenchment that will not fully please renewable and efficiency advocates: in his closing remarks, Kasich circled back and noted that he thought SB 221 would probably benefit from some tweaking, using as an example his exasperation that cogeneration hadn’t been given appropriate eligibility. All signs point to hearings in the Ohio Assembly later this year to re-evaluate SB 221, although the Governor’s stated position providing some cover to renewables and efficiency seems to indicate that SB 221 at least won’t get entirely discarded or thoroughly trashed. Stay tuned.
Indeed, one of the central themes of Kasich’s comments was that all players in the energy sector need to get along, that there’s a place for everyone, albeit maybe not to the degree that any one segment would ideally like. As the Dispatch termed Kasich’s comments, “company executives in gas, solar, coal and other energy sectors needed to agreed to give up some turf as his administration crafts its policy.” In kicking off the event, Kasich asked for “natural gas to work with coal, and coal to work with natural gas, and renewables to work alongside fossil fuels, and for the utilities to get along — well, that might be too much to ask,” a perfect segue into the electric utility panel.
Attendees got to see some pretty feisty verbal jousting between Tony Alexander, CEO of First Energy (NYSE: FE), and Mike Morris, CEO of American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP), who differed strongly on whether competitive markets or regulated rate-base recovery mechanisms led to the best outcomes for electricity prices to consumers. Not surprisingly, First Energy favors competitive markets — as they’ve spun off all their generation into an unregulated subsidiary and can earn attractive margins on their deeply-amortized powerplants — and is therefore unenthusiastic (to put it mildly) about renewable energy and energy efficiency requirements. On the other hand, AEP believes that only regulation can provide enough price certainty and stability to ensure investments in new generation capacity that are both prudent for investors and customers alike.
Keith Trent of Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK) tried to split the difference, arguing for competitive energy markets to induce operational efficiencies and regulated capacity markets to foster capacity investment decisions that avoid boom-and-bust cycles of tightness-and-glut. Perhaps even more striking was the different stance of American Municipal Power (AMP), the generation and transmission cooperative serving several municipal utilities in the Midwest. To be sure, they do have a significant reason to have a different perspective: as a non-profit corporation, they are exempt from regulatory oversight by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and not subject to any of the requirements of SB 221. AMP’s CEO, Marc Gerken, indicated that his customers — the municipal utilities — were driving AMP to invest more in renewables such as hydro and wind, in large part to insulate themselves against the likely prospect that wholesale power prices will only increase due to rising fuel prices, more stringent environmental requirements and tightening capacity markets.
Regarding coal, which the Dispatch article referred to as “long a driver of the state’s energy economy that is still subsidized with state taxpayer dollars,” Kasich noted that “we’re not going to walk away from coal.” I remember Kasich also saying that “we’ll be using coal for the rest of my lifetime.” However, Kasich said that we also “have to be mindful of the downside of it. And we’ve got to think about cleaning it.” In a subsequent interview with ClimateWire, as reported in The New York Times, Kasich acknowledged climate change as a legitimate concern, not taking the skeptical or denial positions so common to the beliefs of many of his fellow Republicans: “there isn’t any question that the activities of humans have an impact. As to what the extent of it is, I don’t know.”
So, while he’s keeping the door open for coal, and supports its continued use, he’s also not blindly defending it to the death either. I wonder if Kasich was amused or embarrassed by the impassioned rant of Robert Murray, President and CEO of Murray Energy Corporation (a privately-held Ohio-based coal mining company), in which he loudly called for the defeat of “Barack Hussein Obama”.
All of this was preamble to the clear centerpiece of the event: the discussion of opportunities afforded by the Utica Shale resource underneath much of Ohio. And, the star of the show was Aubrey McClendon, CEO of Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK), by far the most visible cheerleader for shale gas exploration and production in the U.S.
As reported by BusinessWire, McClendon stated that their early test drilling results indicate that the Utica shale opportunity was likely to be very large — as large or larger as the most productive shale plays in the U.S., such as the Bakken, Barnett, Eagle Ford and (closer to home) Marcellus. Also, it appears that it offers the potential for a three-prong play: natural gas, gas liquids and oil. When pressed to give a sense of magnitude of the Utica prize in Ohio, McClendon offered that he thought it could be worth $500 billion — “I prefer to say half a trillion dollars, it sounds bigger”.
McClendon restated what he had claimed in an early August appearance on Jim Cramer’s “Mad Money” CNBC show: that he can foresee $20 billion of investment per year in Ohio for the next 20 years to pursue Utica opportunities. Coinciding with the event, the Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program (OOGEEP) released initial results of an economic analysis that estimated about 203,000 jobs in Ohio to be created by 2015 — just three years from now! — associated with pursuit of Utica shale gas.
Of course, these kinds of incredible (non-credible?) numbers being thrown around cause officials in economically-challenged Ohio to salivate. According to the New York Times, Kasich said that “we’re sort of experiencing a gold rush.”
The only pushback to unfettered pursuit of Utica is the rising chorus of concern from a wide range of environmental advocates about the use of hydraulic fracturing, more commonly-known as fracking, to produce gas from shale. Among other places, New York, New Jersey and Maryland have issued moratoriums on fracking, primarily due to worries that the process will lead to water contamination, and secondarily due to fears that the activity may lead to ancillary emissions of methane (a potent greenhouse gas) and may increase prospects for earthquakes.
In the New York Times account, Kasich was adamant: “There’s no problem with fracking. I dismiss that.” One of the reasons Kasich feels so confident: under the prior Strickland Administration, the state of Ohio passed SB 165, a set of laws concerning oil/gas production that are claimed to be among the most stringent in the nation, including strong requirements for triple-casing all drilled holes to mitigate the potential for contamination or leakage to seep into other strata or release to the surface.
It appears that the Kasich Administration is bending over backwards to clear the path for Utica shale development, recently reassigning David Mustine from being the head of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources to a position that Kasich called “Shale Czar” in the newly-created privatized economic development agency JobsOhio. From being invisible a year ago, Chesapeake has become a high-profile sponsor of Ohio State football — probably the most-scrutinized activity in Ohio — and McClendon has been known to meet frequently with top officials from Ohio.
Personally, I worry that the Utica shale is being viewed by the Kasich Administration and by certain segments of the government and private sector as the answer to all of Ohio’s issues. Based on what I’m seeing, the state may soon be renamed “Uticana”.
I have no problem with environmentally-responsible fracking, which I believe is in fact doable, and endorse the pursuit of shale gas as long as it is truly “done right” (a phrase used often during the two-day event). However, I fear that the Utica shale opportunity will be less spectacular than claimed — and if so, then putting all of Ohio’s eggs in that basket will have been a mistake. McClendon and others on the shale panel noted frequently, as a disclaimer, that the drilling test results were still preliminary. And, as the experience in other shale basins indicates, decline rates from shale production have been very steep — much more so than from conventional gas wells.
For the U.S. has long been insufficiently diversified: we have an energy system that depends way-too-much on oil for transportation and coal for power generation. As a result of that long over-reliance, we’re now painted into a challenging corner on a variety of environmental, geopolitical and economic fronts. I don’t believe that any one energy solution — even those I have advocated for in Ohio, such as the offshore wind efforts being undertaken by the Lake Erie Energy Development Corporation (LEEDCo) and its partners — is the cure-all for our current challenges, or the road to future successes.
Betting the farm on any one thing, even something as seemingly-compelling as Utica shale, will just paint us into another corner a few years from now. To avoid this outcome, we need a more resilient and robust energy system — one that only diversification can provide. In turn, this will require regulatory innovation, technological innovation and capital.
If I have a criticism of the two-day summit, it is that the last two input factors — technological innovation and capital — were mainly excluded from the proceedings. There was literally no discussion of financing of the energy sector in the coming deacdes.
As for technology, the master of ceremonies, Joe Stanislaw, helped frame the conference at its outset with some big-picture remarks, including his provocative observation that “energy represents the new Great Game for the 21st Century”: there is an intense global competition not only for the energy resources of the world, but the technologies to enable continued access to affordable energy to fuel economic growth. Alas, the discussion panels never picked up on Stanislaw’s point.
If Ohio is to be something more than Uticana, not only does it need to pursue other energy options with some degree of vigor, it must also commit to creating an environment conducive to cleantech innovation and entrepreneurship — the font of much job-creation and wealth-creation in the 21st Century. Surely, this is something that should be well-appreciated by Mark Kvamme (Kasich confidante, head of Jobs Ohio, and long-time venture capitalist at Sequoia Capital) and Wilber James (Kasich confidante, long-time venture capitalist at RockPort Capital, and planner of the agenda for this two-day event).
Notwithstanding the potential riches associated with the Utica shale, we cannot allow Ohio to become primarily a resource-extraction economy. While some degree of resource-extraction is inevitable in modern society, examples near (West Virginia) and far (Nigeria) suggest that overreliance on this segment of economic activity is a path towards massive inequities and injustices, environmental degradation, low standards of living, and a wide variety of social ills.