If ignorance is bliss, then we’re certainly blessed by generally not bothering to confront the pretty-alarming conclusions of the report.
A pastiche of the highlighted snippets in the Executive Summary, when stitched together, provide a glimpse of the world we’re now choosing to invent for ourselves and future generations:
“There are few signs that the urgently needed change in direction in global energy trends is underway.”
“Global investment in energy supply infrastructure of $38 trillion (in year-2010 dollars) is required over the period 2011 to 2035.”
“The age of fossil fuels is far from over, but their dominance declines.”
“The cost of bringing oil to market rises as oil companies are forced to turn to more difficult and costly sources to replace lost capacity and meet rising demand.”
“Factors both on the supply and demand sides point to a bright future, even a golden age, for natural gas.”
“Coal has met almost half of the increase in global energy demand over the last decade. Whether this trend alters and how quickly is among the most important questions for the future of the global energy economy.”
“The dynamics of energy markets are increasingly determined by countries outside the OECD.”
“All of the net increase in oil demand comes from the transport sector in emerging economies, as economic growth pushes up demand for personal mobility and freight.”
“China’s consumption of coal is almost half of global demand and its Five-Year Plan for 2011 to 2015, which aims to reduce the energy and carbon intensity of the economy, will be a determining factor for world coal markets.”
“Russia’s large energy resources underpin its continuing role as a cornerstone of the global energy economy of the coming decades. Russia aims to create a more efficient economy, less dependent on oil and gas, but needs to pick up the pace of change.”
“International concern about the issue of energy access is growing. Around $9 billion was invested globally to provide first access to modern energy, but more than five-times this amount, $48 billion, needs to be invested each year if universal access is to be achieved by 2030.”
“We cannot afford to delay further action to combat climate change.”
“New energy efficiency measures make a difference, but much more is required.”
“Widespread deployment of more efficient coal-fired power plants and carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology could boost the long-term prospects for coal, but there are still considerable hurdles.”
“Events at Fukushima Daiichi have raised questions about the future of nuclear power.”
“The wide difference in outcomes between [the scenarios analyzed in this report] underlies the critical role of governments to define the objectives and implement the policies necessary to shape our future.”
When observing the dysfunctional nature of the current political ecosystems in the U.S., in Europe, and in world affairs (e.g., the United Nations), and the increasing imperative for economic austerity to resolve the shortfalls in public coffers, it is hard to believe that governments (other than autocratic places like China and Russia) will be able to take any meaningful action to nudge the energy sector from its trajectory of “muddle-along.” The chaos that IEA describes in the world energy scene will thus likely only intensify.
Lots of challenges in this world. But, then again, lots of opportunities too.